On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 9:58:23 AM UTC+2, TiddlyTweeter wrote: ... > *The issue is this: When evaluating "A better Markdown for TW" what are we > specifically talking about? It sure isn't Fountain. But WHAT is it?* >
I think those TW rules should understand markdown Paragraphs in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Paragraphs%20in%20WikiText> Lists in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Lists%20in%20WikiText> Linking in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Linking%20in%20WikiText> Images in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Images%20in%20WikiText> Headings in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Headings%20in%20WikiText> Formatting in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Formatting%20in%20WikiText> Code Blocks in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Code%20Blocks%20in%20WikiText> HTML in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#HTML%20in%20WikiText> Hard Linebreaks in WikiText <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Hard%20Linebreaks%20in%20WikiText> According to the CommonMark spec <https://spec.commonmark.org/0.29/> ... with some exceptions. So the MIME type may be text/markdown; variant=tiddlywiki CM spec contains a lot of redundant rules and start / end markers. We need them for the important stuff like transclusions, macros ... and so on. see: https://tiddlywiki.com/#WikiText -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5099a545-f916-4f5c-a241-8252e3b90623%40googlegroups.com.
