Mark Kerrigan wrote: > As a general rule, I find mixing Markdown and TiddlyWiki wikitext not the > best idea. >
> My main use case for Markdown is as an interoperable format. > > If I were to mix Markdown and wikitext, then I could no longer be certain > the document I create will be interoperable > Ciao Mark *Spot-on*. IF a new user is *Markdown Happy *then it makes MOST sense to directly support it natively, NO compromise. If you mix up TW WikiText with some variant of Markdown you likely end up with a Nasty SpongeBob that FUs decent portability. The OP was really trying to tease out a non-TW issue. That demands for better parsing of "Markdown" are way too GENERIC. WHICH end-versions if Markdown are we needing to support? TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a7ac7fc9-a36d-495e-998d-80abc921f1e3%40googlegroups.com.
