I'm not sure if it's fair to compare TW with all these tools. What exactly is lost if TW does not immediately appeal to a broad audience?
TiddlyWiki is like a programming language, so some learning curve is part of the experience. We can do amazing things with TW, both functionally and aesthetically, but only after investing in "cognitive load": learning and practicing the language. Much of the flexibility could be lost if more "features" were forced upon the uninitiated "out of the box". An audience unwilling to learn is perhaps not TiddlyWiki's target "market"? Maybe it's apples to oranges in the first place? Just some thoughts. On Thursday, 28 May 2020 12:39:43 UTC+1, Reet Pandher wrote: > > Is felix hiyashi in this group? > > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 5:07:18 PM UTC+5:30, Tony K wrote: >> >> I do use Obsidian and it is great >> >> however give me a faster version of TiddlyMap and I wld be happy, vis.js >> is very slow >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 at 6:48:34 PM UTC+3, Diego Mesa wrote: >>> >>> Yet another Roam competitor, Obsidian: "Obsidian is a powerful knowledge >>> base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files." >>> >>> Link: >>> https://obsidian.md/ >>> >>> HN Comments: >>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23324598 >>> >>> Note the creator of obsidian is in the comments as well. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ba615096-4062-4c27-be78-d39a8e6ad84c%40googlegroups.com.
