Ciao bimlas I want to underline the point you can use Mark's tool to simply edit Tiddlers en mass without ANY consequence of splitting at all.
In those cases, likely very common, actually, there would be NO issue on search of the type you describe. Just a comment TT On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 12:58:27 UTC+2, bimlas wrote: > > MarkS, > > It’s an ingenious solution, but I see the same problem in it as in bullet > list solutions: it makes searching cumbersome. For example, if I search for > "create", only that paragraph will be included in the search results, so if > I want to see the original tiddler, I have to search back by its name. I > don’t know if it simplifies or complicates life. > > One solution might be to store the original tiddler of the paragraph in a > field and create a view template that displays a link to the original > tiddler at the bottom of the paragraph tiddler. Although in this case, > renaming the original tiddler breaks the connection because it does not > rewrite it in every field. However, this problem also exists with the > current operation: if I rename the "How To Use NotoWritey" tiddler in the > demo, I can't retrieve the parent based on the title of the paragraphs > because they still contain the original title. > > I feel a growing need to be able to identify tiddlers by an always > constant UUID in the TiddlyWiki core as well. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f0f940fd-5df3-4e6e-a5c0-721581e02241%40googlegroups.com.
