David One way to look at what you tried to do is give a parameter that was made of two parameters a literal and transclusion in the same parameter in this case href.
Imagin if you were tiddlywiki yourself. First you need to evaluate what the result of the transclusion is then remember it was part of the same value as the literal string then combine them and only then use the result as the value to pass as a parameter. This is like Eisenstein sitting on a light beam. When you think about it from tiddlywikis's perspective you are asking too much. You should take responcibility for concatenation of disparit values before you ask tiddlywiki to consider it a single value for a parameter. Does this make sense to you? regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b10c067d-15a6-4ae7-995f-74f6694435c0o%40googlegroups.com.
