Also, there's a relevant GitHub issue here: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1890
Am 13.07.20 um 05:14 schrieb Florian: > Hi CJ, > > I am currently trying to accomplish something similar, although you're > already more advanced in your progression. I am by no means an subject > matter expert, just a few thoughts on your setup. > > I really like the idea of systematically providing attribution. Although > there are some great examples in the wild my feeling is that proper > licensing and attribution could still be facilitated by establishing > best practices. Whats more, I guess in an environment where copying > content is as easy as drag-and-drop, some more advanced source tracking > (as well as author and license) could also be integrated in the core. > > I think a good separation between content and code in own public > TiddlyWikis might be such a best practice, because this allows to > separately use content licenses (e. g. CC BY-*) and code licenses (e. g. > BSD style licenses) appropriately. CC BY-* licenses should not be used > for source code, so I would include a permissive software license to > your standard setup as well that applies to all custom code (maybe > BSD-3-Clause because that's what TW core uses). (An alternative, of > course, would be to use the CC0 1.0 license for both, content and code > or some other software license with a statement on what constitutes > source code.) In case you do add a software license, maybe also be more > specific about what is licensed as CC BY 4.0, i. e. "this wiki's > content" (not just "this work"). > > I also like the version notice, which makes it easy to recognize > outdated offline copies. > > You probably don't need the copyright symbol (as in "©TiddlyWiki") > because it has no legal effect (see [1]), also it is usually followed by > the year of first publication and the author's name---not the name of > the work (TiddlyWiki). I would omit it as it just might spark confusion. > > I agree with Chris that adding a license notice as you did might be a > great *addition* to including the license text for each individually > licensed component (such as plugins). > > Regards, > Florian > > Links > [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_symbol > > Am 12.07.20 um 07:02 schrieb CJ Veniot: >> G'day all, >> >> I'm just wondering if what I've done is good enough, or if I need to do >> some more to cover all the bases (whatever those bases are!) >> >> I'm kind of like a fish out of water here. A tiddler out of water ! >> >> Please, let me know what you think: >> https://intertwingularityslicendice.neocities.org/CJ_TiddlyWiki_Configuration.html >> >> Much appreciated ! >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dd114319-278f-f490-f43e-6046507c4696%40anche.no.
