bimlas wrote: > > > *Me: FWIW, TW would be a Good tool to demonstrate different approaches in. > Its got the flex to support many approaches. Frankly there is a lack, > generally, on-line of clear examples demonstrating comparatively where > different approaches come out.* > > Bimal: Do you mean tutorials? For example how to implement >> >> - Evernote, Roam Research, ... >> >> >> - Zettelkasten, Evergreen Notes, ... >> >> >> - Tag-based song collection >> >> >> - Family tree >> >> if I understand correctly, you specifically want to demonstrate the > implementation of note-taking methods (Zettelkasten, Evergreen Notes), > right?
Right. Especially the different outcomes of commitment to *specific linking strategies *(rather than product names). I think that would be invaluable. Not just for TW, but the net in general. There is a lot of talk ... Roam or whatnot, as if it was new. It IS NOT. Its been gone over many times already. What we really need to help users is improve understanding of what the* RESULTS *look like in different approaches. That does not need to be in one wiki. For instance your focus on Zettelkasten is a powerful approach---honoring unique originating tiddlers fixed at their creation point---is powerful & productive. Showing How & Why will help that on. Hope that clarifies what I meant! Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/90e193ab-bd64-4cc2-8942-2025081615a5o%40googlegroups.com.
