Tones & Mat Tones, right.
Being in the middle of *imposed* changes FOR what? it is difficult to know where to go forward. The whole WHY of this is still obscure whilst the Losses are Obvious & Problematic RE the OP ... Right now understanding and protesting on preserving basic function seems more on-point than bending via an extension to offset deficit. Just 2 cents TT On Friday, 18 September 2020 09:29:21 UTC+2, TW Tones wrote: > > I reviewed the new desktop groups view, It is more complete than when I > last looked. > > However the mobile view I can not reply or star, its useless for anything > but reading without the ability to star or reply. > > Regards > Tony > > On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 16:53:06 UTC+10 TW Tones wrote: > >> Mat, >> >> My Replies in line; >> >> You asked if anyone was interested, and I asked questions so I could >> understand and give an honest answer to you. I am sorry if you think my >> response was stupid, because it feels that way. >> >> >> On Friday, 18 September 2020 14:57:16 UTC+10, Mat wrote: >>> >>> I am interested in the method as a whole, but I wonder what you see it >>>> as achieving? >>>> >>> >>> (How can this not be clear in my post?) To improve the new GG interface. >>> >> >> Improve, in what ways, I cant see much difference between the two. I >> wondered what elements you are suggesting, had you other ideas? >> >> >>> >>> >>> Perhaps some exploration of the GG interface and subsequent >>>> customisation's makes sense but I we loose it all, to the new groups then >>>> it may be wasted effort. Perhaps after the transition to the new groups? >>>> >>> >>> My post refers to the new UI (again, how is this not clear?). Google >>> already made the change for me some days back. I have the new UI and there >>> is no more an option to go back. >>> >> >> I know this, Google clearly needs to change a lot more when I use the New >> Groups view, it fails to meet basic needs, This enforced change did not >> occur for me. Ia m guessing more changes will occur, But I will revise the >> latest version after this reply. >> >> >>> >>> >>> I also wonder if it is an opportunity to have a dial on demand >>>> alternative on top of regular tiddlywikis, perhaps to make a more compact >>>> view etc... >>>> >>> >>> This has nothing to do with TW. TW can be styled internally. >>> >> >> Of course, but I am asking if the mechanism can be used for this as well. >> Typically I can only style internally If I can save the wiki, I was >> wondering as a visitor. >> >> >>> >>> <:-) >>> >> >> SIncerly >> Tones >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e65047b9-f2c5-47ff-a71b-ca9940f4275eo%40googlegroups.com.
