Saq,
Thanks for this variation. Its elegant in many ways.
Some observations to do with as you please.
- In this case you are using the "*" wiki text to target the lines.
- The recent tool to allow new lines to maintain the depth of bullets
would go nicely with this, ie **something<enter> creates the new line
prefixed by **
- In some work I am doing with Mario (he is doing the lions share of
coding), we are looking at introducing new pragmas, custom ones. I see
some
relationships to this (beware its a "rabbit hole" we are currently
mapping), but it is revolutionary. So your input would be welcome,
keeping
in mind "a lot of water has already gone under the bridge".
- If you could ignore and reinstate content that does not start "*" as
an example it would help, but I expect you have thought about that.
- Finally when writing such lists one of my most common desires is to
have some as a checklist, or to do item. The ability to indicate it needs
to be done or has being done or cancelled.
- Perhaps all it requires is a version of Eskas
link https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/drA7IEx2Ng0/m/vddE7Iu_AwAJ,
as content in the line item
- eg * [ ] Text - it just needs streams to accommodate it. An earlier
version did not produce a list.
- Perhaps in the todo case the independent tiddler remains, and can
be annotated?
Any way, just food for thought.
As a "heavily engaged in tiddlywiki enthusiast", I must say the
opportunities and innovations this year 2020 are extensive and will take
time to propagate into everyday users, but developers such as yourself help
this by maintaining robust integrated solutions. I remain active in the non
plugin area as a super user to always offer that perspective, I hope it
helps.
Thank You
Tones
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 02:43:12 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote:
> I am going through a busy period at the moment and don't really have time
> for discussions, but I wanted to share a demo that may provide inspiration
> for others working on solutions similar to Streams.
>
> Streams was written specifically for the ability to easily create multiple
> tiddlers with a fast workflow while creating content. However I realize
> that many people use it just for the fast writing experience for lists, but
> do not actually want to create multiple tiddlers. Hopefully some of those
> needs are met by the Editor AutoLists solution that was posted recently.
>
> Here is another take on a better writing experience for lists that
> leverages the advantages of breaking content into tiddlers in TW, but
> doesn't result in multiple tiddlers in the end.
>
> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/single-tiddler-streams.html
>
> Cheers,
> Saq
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f09984b9-e786-4454-a72c-b45f7a3ae8d3n%40googlegroups.com.
