One more thing to add: Do I always have to add a field "streams-type: singletiddler" in order to edit the tiddler's content?
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 6:22:27 AM UTC+2 TW Tones wrote: > Saq, > > Thanks for this variation. Its elegant in many ways. > > Some observations to do with as you please. > > - In this case you are using the "*" wiki text to target the lines. > - The recent tool to allow new lines to maintain the depth of > bullets would go nicely with this, ie **something<enter> creates the > new > line prefixed by ** > - In some work I am doing with Mario (he is doing the lions share > of coding), we are looking at introducing new pragmas, custom ones. I > see > some relationships to this (beware its a "rabbit hole" we are currently > mapping), but it is revolutionary. So your input would be welcome, > keeping > in mind "a lot of water has already gone under the bridge". > - If you could ignore and reinstate content that does not start "*" as > an example it would help, but I expect you have thought about that. > - Finally when writing such lists one of my most common desires is to > have some as a checklist, or to do item. The ability to indicate it needs > to be done or has being done or cancelled. > - Perhaps all it requires is a version of Eskas link > https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/drA7IEx2Ng0/m/vddE7Iu_AwAJ, > as content in the line item > - eg * [ ] Text - it just needs streams to accommodate it. An > earlier version did not produce a list. > - Perhaps in the todo case the independent tiddler remains, and can > be annotated? > > Any way, just food for thought. > > As a "heavily engaged in tiddlywiki enthusiast", I must say the > opportunities and innovations this year 2020 are extensive and will take > time to propagate into everyday users, but developers such as yourself help > this by maintaining robust integrated solutions. I remain active in the non > plugin area as a super user to always offer that perspective, I hope it > helps. > > Thank You > Tones > > > On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 02:43:12 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote: > >> I am going through a busy period at the moment and don't really have time >> for discussions, but I wanted to share a demo that may provide inspiration >> for others working on solutions similar to Streams. >> >> Streams was written specifically for the ability to easily create >> multiple tiddlers with a fast workflow while creating content. However I >> realize that many people use it just for the fast writing experience for >> lists, but do not actually want to create multiple tiddlers. Hopefully some >> of those needs are met by the Editor AutoLists solution that was posted >> recently. >> >> Here is another take on a better writing experience for lists that >> leverages the advantages of breaking content into tiddlers in TW, but >> doesn't result in multiple tiddlers in the end. >> >> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/single-tiddler-streams.html >> >> Cheers, >> Saq >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0740825a-e49c-4ab1-9e12-61c24b9bf5d5n%40googlegroups.com.
