Cade,
The contains operator is newer than GenTags. Also as I said earlier;
- *Instead I tend to use my own fields and list fields that in many ways
work not unlike tags if you want them to.*
- *See listops and other operators and widgets.*
Tones
On Tuesday, 29 September 2020 02:11:22 UTC+10, Cade Roux wrote:
>
> OK, that appears to work. I was working from the readme on GenTags. I
> think to do what I need, I don't even really need the GenTags plugin anyway
> (I don't need to display the tags), and this wasn't relying on it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cade
>
> On Monday, September 28, 2020 at 9:26:34 AM UTC-5 Eric Shulman wrote:
>
>> On Monday, September 28, 2020 at 6:39:48 AM UTC-7, Cade Roux wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW, to me it appears like the listed operator cannot be re-used in the
>>> run for some reason, even on a different parameter or different field. Yet
>>> by itself just once, combined with tag does work. I made my.field and
>>> my.field2 with combinations of A, B, C and X, Y, Z respectively and put
>>> alpha, beta, gamma in tags, and combining tag operator with listed works
>>> fine. And tag filter intersection seems to work as
>>> expected: [tag[alpha]tag[gamma]]
>>>
>>> Perhaps the clunky original plan of prefixing tags for the possible
>>> values of each field may have to be what I resort to. e.g. [tag[name-some
>>> name]tag[structure-some structure]tag[context-some context]]
>>>
>>
>> I think you might be using the wrong filter operator! Try using
>> "contains:fieldname[value]", like this:
>>
>> <$list filter="[contains:my.field[A]contains:my.field[C]]" />
>>
>> (see https://tiddlywiki.com/#contains%20Operator)
>>
>> -e
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/acb52440-21e1-4b29-8082-a2fd8bcc2609o%40googlegroups.com.
