PMario wrote: > > > ... So for me it looks like a 20/80 approach. 20% of time invested to get > 80% of functions out of it. > > This gives you the possibility to implement 5 different libs (as seen at: > https://gt6796c.github.io/) at the same time as doing 100% for 1 library. > ... (sometimes) That's a good idea >
Right. Ambitious but useful. It seems none of the libraries took of (eg: lack of feedback), > Right. There was virtually no feedback at all. Though the tool really needed a lot to help the author. I am pretty sure that is why its development froze. They got no feedback. --- The "Mermaid" approach is interesting. Mainly because it is a unifying front-end that, if done well, would save a lot of hassle. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dc7302b0-5b15-4997-8c3b-4ecd28266e7bo%40googlegroups.com.
