>>> The underlying problem is that we are creating several tiddlers at the same time via action-widgets, and the tiddler titles rely on a timestamp to make them unique. However, the tiddlers are sometimes created so quickly that they are not unique!
Just out of curiosity, why do you need to create two timestamped tiddlers? Can't the text before the caret keep the title of the original tiddler, and the rest of the text get a new timestamp? On Thursday, 3 December 2020 at 17:27:48 UTC [email protected] wrote: > So the bug that Dom reported is very interesting and others may find it of > interest. > > The underlying problem is that we are creating several tiddlers at the > same time via action-widgets, and the tiddler titles rely on a timestamp to > make them unique. However, the tiddlers are sometimes created so quickly > that they are not unique! > > There have been discussions on this group in the past on the merits of > using timestamps for tiddler titles and this is a good reminder that they > just aren't specific enough to serve as a proper unique identifier. > > I am going to have take a moment and think about the best way to resolve > this. I know users prefer timestamps to randomly generated UUIDs so I have > to consider if there is a middle ground. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1c57c9f9-9541-4782-ac36-1b434bcb9620n%40googlegroups.com.
