@si no worries, there are a lot of different options and features to keep track of.
I have an idea for a new widget to solve the problem that might be helpful in other places too. On Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 8:48:49 PM UTC+1 si wrote: > Ahh my apologies I had misunderstood the purpose of the shortcut. I > thought it was supposed to create a new node from text following the caret, > but I realize now that that just happens when you press enter. > > On Thursday, 3 December 2020 at 19:38:35 UTC [email protected] wrote: > >> @si this bug relates to splitting a tiddler into multiple tiddlers by >> pressing Alt+Enter. >> >> So for instance the following results in 6 tiddlers if saved with >> Alt+Enter. The first keeps the original title but the 5 subsequent ones are >> new. >> >> "a >> >> b >> >> c >> >> d >> >> e >> >> f" >> >> >> >> On Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 8:33:37 PM UTC+1 si wrote: >> >>> >>> The underlying problem is that we are creating several tiddlers at >>> the same time via action-widgets, and the tiddler titles rely on a >>> timestamp to make them unique. However, the tiddlers are sometimes created >>> so quickly that they are not unique! >>> >>> Just out of curiosity, why do you need to create two timestamped >>> tiddlers? Can't the text before the caret keep the title of the original >>> tiddler, and the rest of the text get a new timestamp? >>> On Thursday, 3 December 2020 at 17:27:48 UTC [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> So the bug that Dom reported is very interesting and others may find it >>>> of interest. >>>> >>>> The underlying problem is that we are creating several tiddlers at the >>>> same time via action-widgets, and the tiddler titles rely on a timestamp >>>> to >>>> make them unique. However, the tiddlers are sometimes created so quickly >>>> that they are not unique! >>>> >>>> There have been discussions on this group in the past on the merits of >>>> using timestamps for tiddler titles and this is a good reminder that they >>>> just aren't specific enough to serve as a proper unique identifier. >>>> >>>> I am going to have take a moment and think about the best way to >>>> resolve this. I know users prefer timestamps to randomly generated UUIDs >>>> so >>>> I have to consider if there is a middle ground. >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c244c763-1a33-46de-bdd1-5a787aefe1d5n%40googlegroups.com.
