Hi, I have the same problem here. Could someone provide a way to remove 
Stroll? Thanks.

On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 10:18:26 PM UTC+1 [email protected] 
wrote:

>
> A different approach to also consider :) 
>
> https://joearms.github.io/#2018-12-26%20Fun%20with%20the%20TiddlyWiki
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 9:27:00 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the pointer, @Zak, to that 'FieldMangler Widget'  -just what i 
>> needed to solve the problem (sorta :-/
>>
>> By adding this widget to the script on both ToDo and Completed tiddlers, 
>> i'm now able to invoke "tm-remove-tag" and "tm-add-tag" commands 
>> (respectively) on those two functional tiddlers, such that i can make the 
>> object tiddler either appear or disappear on the ToDo list in Contents tab 
>> of my instance.
>>
>> Only problem is: i had to add a button (the thing to which 'FieldManager 
>> Widget' must be attached, AFAICT from the docs 
>> <https://tiddlywiki.com/static/WidgetMessage%253A%2520tm-remove-tag.html>) 
>> after the checkbox widget on those two functional tiddlers -a 'plus' button 
>> on ToDo tiddler and a 'trashcan' button on Completed tiddler- to enable 
>> execution of the function, as you can see on the attached image.  If there 
>> be some way to execute that "tm-remove-tag" command from the checkbox 
>> widget itself, that would be a nice refinement!    /walt
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 6:10:07 PM UTC [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > try my hand a bit of scripting
>>> That's good to hear - just stick with it and you will be amazed what 
>>> /you/ can do :) 
>>>
>>> For reference the developer docs are usually a good place to start (if 
>>> you haven't already) [1]. 
>>>
>>> From a very quick check, maybe you can try having a look at [2][3] which 
>>> references "tm-remove-tag", as it looks like in your code snippet you are 
>>> not taking any action in your checkbox code to remove the todo tag.
>>>
>>> Please keep in mind that I am brand new to TiddlyWiki and have zero 
>>> TiddlyWiki coding experience :) [lots of other coding experience though] 
>>>
>>> [1] https://tiddlywiki.com/dev/
>>> [2] https://tiddlywiki.com/static/FieldManglerWidget.html
>>> [3] https://tiddlywiki.com/static/Messages.html
>>>
>>>
>>> > best survival strategy in these waters is to
>>>
>>> yeah, sounds like a reasonable strategy :)
>>>
>>> Something else to maybe also keep in mind is that unless you really need 
>>> something in a new release, it is usually much more practical/safer to run 
>>> a version/couple of versions behind the latest version. There is a much 
>>> higher likelihood that by the time that you then upgrade to the next 
>>> version, most of the issues that you might run into would already have been 
>>> solved/worked out.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 12:08:58 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, @Zak -your reply has inspired me to (a) be patient (am doing 
>>>> fine w/ v5.1.22 of TW + Stroll, in fact) and (b) to try my hand a bit of 
>>>> scripting, per message just posted about my "Task Tracker scripting 
>>>> challenge <https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/tiddlywiki/c/1GLZFOgtHKQ>."
>>>>
>>>> Moreover: following your link to the Stroll Help page 
>>>> <https://giffmex.org/stroll/stroll.html#Help%20%2F%20Acknowledgments>, 
>>>> i stumbled upon the TiddlyWiki toolmap 
>>>> <https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM> that @Dave Gifford 
>>>> has somehow managed to compile.  I cannot imagine the work involved in 
>>>> compiling such a list, let alone keeping it current... So i now see how 
>>>> the 
>>>> bigger issue here of how to manage plugin dependencies is a hairy one 
>>>> indeed.  Why: the Task Management category (the problem space i am 
>>>> currently exploring) alone has some 27 solutions linked (!), and if one 
>>>> were to install any number of these plugins -what the TW product 
>>>> architecture makes it so easy to do- i can well imagine how easy it would 
>>>> be to fall into the hellhole of cascading dependency failures.
>>>>
>>>> So: i am ever-more convinced now that my best survival strategy in 
>>>> these waters is to: (1) keep my complement of installed plugins to the 
>>>> absolute minimum of things i really can't live without; and (2) learn as 
>>>> much as i can about what's under the hood of those, in case i am ever 
>>>> having to patch up some leak on my own, should ever come to that (i sure 
>>>> hope not, because i've been down that road of my own making a few times in 
>>>> past, and i've got the scars to prove it!)
>>>>
>>>> /walt
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 8:26:56 PM UTC [email protected] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > So i gotta ask, am curious: which path have you taken?
>>>>> I am currently living with it until it's fixed. 
>>>>>
>>>>> >  i do wish i had the coding chops to fix the problem
>>>>> Don't think it would be too hard to track down the problem. Especially 
>>>>> because of the TiddlyWiki approach, i.e. it is only html + javascript. 
>>>>> And 
>>>>> your browser already has some powerful debugging tools built in :) 
>>>>>
>>>>> > how are these Plugin dependencies to be managed?  
>>>>> I suppose it comes down to the individual author(s) of a particular 
>>>>> plugin. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Some plugins follow a more "traditional" flow. It has a public source 
>>>>> code repo (github/gitlab/etc.), issue tracker, etc. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Other plugins don't have their code in a publicly accessible place 
>>>>> (e.g. private github repo/file system/google drive/etc.) and so there 
>>>>> isn't 
>>>>> really a traditional issue tracker available.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Stroll support page [1] indicates it falls in the second category 
>>>>> and that simply posting issues to this group is good enough. 
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]: 
>>>>> https://giffmex.org/stroll/stroll.html#Help%20%2F%20Acknowledgments
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 6:50:07 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, @z... for validating the issue.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So i gotta ask, am curious: which path have you taken? roll back to 
>>>>>> earlier version of TW, or live w/o Stroll until it's fixed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This raised for me a related issue -that is, more generally speaking: 
>>>>>> how are these Plugin dependencies to be managed?  Not to apply any 
>>>>>> pressure 
>>>>>> to FOSS developers who have given so much to the commons already (esp 
>>>>>> @jeremy & @david gifford -you guys rock!), i do wish i had the coding 
>>>>>> chops 
>>>>>> to fix the problem, but alas... All i can do is post a message here in 
>>>>>> the 
>>>>>> gGroup and wait, until... What, i wonder?  Maybe i'll be lucky and catch 
>>>>>> notice of a fix, if/when it flows thru this channel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or better: is there an issue tracker somewhere, for these issues to 
>>>>>> be flagged and worked-on until they get solved?  Am always happy to 
>>>>>> participate in this process as a tester, when it comes to software as 
>>>>>> important to me as TW + Stroll is!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /walt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 3:59:56 PM UTC [email protected] 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @ludwa6 - same issue here so don't think you are missing anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 7:33:24 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As reported some weeks ago 
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/dZmp1gQivJI/m/CHKsGbMQAQAJ>, 
>>>>>>>> when i upgraded TW to version 5.1.23, certain features -both Close and 
>>>>>>>> Delete buttons in the edit screen- stopped working;  this was 
>>>>>>>> purported to 
>>>>>>>> be related to some code in the Stroll plugin that would need to be 
>>>>>>>> updated.  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile: my workflow being more dependent on Stroll than new 
>>>>>>>> features of TW v5.1.23, i've rolled my TW instance back to v5.1.22... 
>>>>>>>> Which 
>>>>>>>> remains my working version, as nothing seems to have changed in Stroll 
>>>>>>>> code, unless i am missing something. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now nearly a month on, i am wondering: Am i in fact missing 
>>>>>>>> something?  I don't hear of other in this community having any such 
>>>>>>>> problems, so i wonder if this might in fact be a problem on my end.  
>>>>>>>> Am 
>>>>>>>> using TiddlyDesktop 0.0.13 (13) to manage my working index.html file, 
>>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>>> case that matters.  Would love to hear any ideas about how to get 
>>>>>>>> around 
>>>>>>>> this problem!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/32a3a6e3-b69b-47ec-b3ce-98ea26a7eb6bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to