David, Ah, I had not noticed that you had set up the Instructions as a details drop-down, nice! (The little triangle at left is a bit easy to miss when the summary doesn't have any additional css like contrasting background color.)
It sounds like the conversion process will be quite a project (given that I'm already fully invested in lots of things that won't convert easily into static html, and there's no automatic conversion for getting telmiger-style detail syntax boiled down to html details). Thanks for the documentation! -Springer On Friday, February 12, 2021 at 11:28:46 PM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote: > Hi Springer > > I use the details HTML in mine with statics. For an example, see the > Instructions section of https://giffmex.org/wiki/apocrifos.at.html > > You can't use Telmiger's plugin, or any plugin, with statics. But you CAN > create buttons with simple details snippets. > > I just updated this section for you. > https://giffmex.org/gifts/documenting.tw.html#Sliders%20for%20static%20HTMLs%20with%20details%20and%20summary > > Note that transcluded tiddlers work best if their text is wrapped with > <span> and </span> IN the transcluded tiddler. > > Enjoy! > > > > On Friday, February 12, 2021 at 8:14:24 PM UTC-6 springer wrote: > >> David, >> >> Thanks for sharing this. >> >> I'm anticipating a need to convert a TW resource into a static html >> archive so that it can be "handed off" to people who want something >> standard, linear, and familiar (and that can be served up in non-dynamic >> environments like sharepoint). >> >> So, I might take advantage of something like this. >> >> But one feature I wonder about is whether we can make ample use of html's >> <details> feature to make sections collapsible, preserving a bit of the >> dynamic experience without actually deviating from the linear flow of >> static html. >> >> Of course, there are a couple different variations on details / slider / >> reveal widgets in TiddlyWiki. I use TElmiger's plugin regularly, and would >> love if exporting to static html could translate over to html's simpler >> <details> (with <summary>) syntax. Does that sound possible to you?q >> >> -Springer >> >> On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 11:34:45 AM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> I updated my documentation to include a walk through on my set up for >>> writing: >>> >>> - Long static HTMLs that transclude sections >>> - with id's for section headers for quick navigation to and from a >>> manual table of contents >>> - where the link back up goes all the way to the top of the file, >>> not just to another section. >>> >>> An example, in Spanish, of the output is >>> https://giffmex.org/wiki/apocrifos.at.html >>> >>> The walk through of how to do it, complete with button tiddlers and >>> image tiddlers, is at: >>> >>> >>> https://giffmex.org/gifts/documenting.tw.html#My%20long%20static%20HTML%20setup >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6a7b853b-9066-49fd-a6e4-fb2ce9cba5efn%40googlegroups.com.
