On Sunday, February 14, 2021 at 9:54:03 AM UTC-6 springer wrote:
> David, > > Ah, I had not noticed that you had set up the Instructions as a details > drop-down, nice! (The little triangle at left is a bit easy to miss when > the summary doesn't have any additional css like contrasting background > color.) > It sounds like the conversion process will be quite a project (given that > I'm already fully invested in lots of things that won't convert easily into > static html, and there's no automatic conversion for getting telmiger-style > detail syntax boiled down to html details). > Yes, if you have been using Telmiger's details plugin for a lot of tiddlers, it would take a while. But for starting from scratch, my actual process is actually fairly simple. > > Thanks for the documentation! > > -Springer > On Friday, February 12, 2021 at 11:28:46 PM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote: > >> Hi Springer >> >> I use the details HTML in mine with statics. For an example, see the >> Instructions section of https://giffmex.org/wiki/apocrifos.at.html >> >> You can't use Telmiger's plugin, or any plugin, with statics. But you CAN >> create buttons with simple details snippets. >> >> I just updated this section for you. >> https://giffmex.org/gifts/documenting.tw.html#Sliders%20for%20static%20HTMLs%20with%20details%20and%20summary >> >> Note that transcluded tiddlers work best if their text is wrapped with >> <span> and </span> IN the transcluded tiddler. >> >> Enjoy! >> >> >> >> On Friday, February 12, 2021 at 8:14:24 PM UTC-6 springer wrote: >> >>> David, >>> >>> Thanks for sharing this. >>> >>> I'm anticipating a need to convert a TW resource into a static html >>> archive so that it can be "handed off" to people who want something >>> standard, linear, and familiar (and that can be served up in non-dynamic >>> environments like sharepoint). >>> >>> So, I might take advantage of something like this. >>> >>> But one feature I wonder about is whether we can make ample use of >>> html's <details> feature to make sections collapsible, preserving a bit of >>> the dynamic experience without actually deviating from the linear flow of >>> static html. >>> >>> Of course, there are a couple different variations on details / slider / >>> reveal widgets in TiddlyWiki. I use TElmiger's plugin regularly, and would >>> love if exporting to static html could translate over to html's simpler >>> <details> (with <summary>) syntax. Does that sound possible to you?q >>> >>> -Springer >>> >>> On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 11:34:45 AM UTC-5 David Gifford wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi everyone >>>> >>>> I updated my documentation to include a walk through on my set up for >>>> writing: >>>> >>>> - Long static HTMLs that transclude sections >>>> - with id's for section headers for quick navigation to and from a >>>> manual table of contents >>>> - where the link back up goes all the way to the top of the file, >>>> not just to another section. >>>> >>>> An example, in Spanish, of the output is >>>> https://giffmex.org/wiki/apocrifos.at.html >>>> >>>> The walk through of how to do it, complete with button tiddlers and >>>> image tiddlers, is at: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://giffmex.org/gifts/documenting.tw.html#My%20long%20static%20HTML%20setup >>>> >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d0f18eeb-e6dc-47c9-9bd6-ea86a0853453n%40googlegroups.com.
