On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 3:45:49 PM UTC+1 Soren Bjornstad wrote: > Is it reasonable to call something *deprecated* if it hasn't been > announced as such by the author? That's the best term I can think of, > though it is a little bit on the technical side.
I think deprecated is the right term, is something is superseded by a newer or better version. ... What about "*stalled*" ... for "stopped making progress since xxx years" -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ca090346-37c3-4d3b-adb7-23acd873be87n%40googlegroups.com.
