On the basis of my experience with DataFix.com, I recommend reserving at least both *.net and *.org variations of TiddlyWiki.com. The relatively recent extension of the TLD names has reduces the pressure on domain names, but I clearly remember having to sign a contractual obligation that we would not use DataFix.com for commercial purposes as recently as 1993.
Since DataFix now hosts a large number of sites, we generally register the Sitename.com, *.net and *.org. As a general rule, we use *.com as a default, but data Users tend to operate on .ORG (as in ORGanizational user's) sites, while data Owners tend to use .NET (as in data on interNET) sites. On Friday, March 26, 2021 at 4:12:32 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: > 10 to 15 years ago, we experimented with using https://tiddlywiki.org/ as > a community front page for TiddlyWiki. For a while, we even had a MediaWiki > instance: > > > https://web.archive.org/web/20081216015257/http://www.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Main_Page > > TiddlyWiki community activities seem a good fit for the .org sites: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.org > > So, while I've been working on the links aggregator I've been wondering if > it shouldn't be hosted at tiddlywiki.org or links.tiddlywiki.org to > communicate clearly that it is not a commercial endeavour. > > By the same logic of course, perhaps we should move TiddlyWiki itself to > tiddlywiki.org. > > I'd be interested in thoughts. The only immediate proposal is whether we > move the links aggregator, but it all needs thinking through. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > > > -- > Jeremy Ruston > [email protected] > https://jermolene.com > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c3d19826-fe76-4b49-9ee7-729738e92e0an%40googlegroups.com.
