I explained that poorly. The way that I created the png files (actually using your external files tool) generated 6 byte file images. *These* images do not display correctly.
The zero-byte images generated when making external uri's by hand *do* display correctly. So to be clear, AFAIK, there is nothing wrong with img[] nomenclature under node.js. If there was still a way to mark an issue as resolved, I would do that. Thanks! On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 11:24:56 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > It would helpful to determine what the default behaviour of TW on node.js > is for _canonical_uri tiddlers and saving to file. > > On Windows 10, latest Chrome and using latest pre-release with the server > edition and no plugins, I tried manually creating a tiddler with: > - title: test.png > - type: image/png, > - and an arbitrary _canonical_uri value of files/test.png > > In the tiddlers directory I get a 0 bytes file test.png and test.png.meta. > I am not sure if the 0 byte expected behaviour on node.js for > canonical_uri tiddlers or something new in 5.1.23 > > Using [img[test.png]] in another tiddler, the img is correctly resolved to > have a src attribute files/test.png, both before and after restarting the > node server. > > So I cannot reproduce the problem. It could be OS specific. > > It is worth considering that 5.1.23 had significant changes to the file > saving code, so there may have been a regression. > Also I am using the latest pre-release, which might be relevant as at > least one bugfix since 5.1.23 seems to deal with missing text fields of > tiddlers, see https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/5416/files > > If you can confirm that creating a _canonical_uri tiddler by hand works > well for you on node.js, that will help narrow down whether this is a core > issues or a plugin issue. > > Regards, > Saq > On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 7:43:50 PM UTC+2 Saq Imtiaz wrote: > >> Hmm. That's interesting. I'm seeing 0 byte image files but the images do >> otherwise load correctly. >> What OS and browser are you using? >> >> It would also be interesting to check how TW on node.js on your system, >> with no plugins saves _canonical_uri tiddlers. Are there any image files >> created at all, or just a tid file? >> >> I've been working on this here and there over the last week, so with a >> few more details I should be able to address this. >> >> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 7:24:36 PM UTC+2 Mark S. wrote: >> >>> The problem turned out to be that the way the _canonical_uri files were >>> created was also creating 6byte image files in the tiddler folder which >>> apparently confuses the system into thinking that it is dealing with base64 >>> image files. >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7089cf8b-8e9b-485d-86e1-ef5bf4215167n%40googlegroups.com.
