On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 11:36:17 PM UTC-5 Mohammad wrote: > > Hi Soren, > Very impressive project and one really can learn alot both from > Tiddlywiki point of view and also knowledge/information management. > While I always have to change the pallet to something lighter (I cannot > read some text or find some icons due to low contrast for me = this is > partially because of issues in the official palette), >
Yeah, this is definitely an issue with many of the official palettes (though I've seen issues with some of the light ones too). The only things I can't read clearly the way I have it set up are the modified date, which I barely ever use, and body text expanded within the reference explorer, which I only look at for a few seconds at a time, so I'm pretty happy with this overall. > 23:58 Bibliographies aggregate related sources >> > > You know Refnotes! There we use the Bibtex plus APA7. The benefit is you > can import Bibliography for different sources and there is no need to enter > them manually (error prone, tedious) > ViewTemplates can be used as you did, and one can decide what to show and > how to show fields. > > While I think bibliography on the web and hypertext media can be totally > different, do you think sticking to some standards is better or not? > I do not have a specific opinion here and I want to see what is the best > solution! > I haven't used the ref-management part of Refnotes. I don't think it would work with the framework I've set up from what I can see because I want sources to be first-class citizens with their own tiddlers. I don't usually do inline citations because I tend to paraphrase and generalize quite a bit (though there are exceptions). And while I like BibTeX, I don't think I read enough articles from sources that provide bibliography downloads to make it more efficient than entering the couple of fields I care about myself. Still, thanks for the reminder about this plugin -- I've found the footnotes very useful in the past and I could see that bibliography mechanism being helpful in the future. > 25:38 The Write tab highlights fruitful areas for further work (stubs, >> missing, needing attention, needing excision, to-dos, open questions) >> 29:58 The Reference Explorer shows related tiddlers (backlinks and >> forward links) in a concise table >> > > Wonderful! While I think not all tiddlers need that! I saw it can be > customized > Curious – what tiddlers do you think don't need a link summary? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/56770607-6adf-42b5-bf01-74ec46ea6bd0n%40googlegroups.com.
