Hi Soren, Thank you for clarification! I watched the video given +1.
It has a lot to learn for the way one can use Tiddlywiki for information management! The minimal design, uniformity and consistency is highly appreciated! One thing I like very much is, how the current design of Tiddlywiki can be used effectively! It may be useful to let users download an empty version. I may recommend to use Flibbles Uglify plugin to minimize the empty-Zettelkasten.html for distribution. Best wishes Mohammad On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Soren Bjornstad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 11:36:17 PM UTC-5 Mohammad wrote: > >> >> Hi Soren, >> Very impressive project and one really can learn alot both from >> Tiddlywiki point of view and also knowledge/information management. >> While I always have to change the pallet to something lighter (I cannot >> read some text or find some icons due to low contrast for me = this is >> partially because of issues in the official palette), >> > > Yeah, this is definitely an issue with many of the official palettes > (though I've seen issues with some of the light ones too). The only things > I can't read clearly the way I have it set up are the modified date, which > I barely ever use, and body text expanded within the reference explorer, > which I only look at for a few seconds at a time, so I'm pretty happy with > this overall. > > >> 23:58 Bibliographies aggregate related sources >>> >> >> You know Refnotes! There we use the Bibtex plus APA7. The benefit is you >> can import Bibliography for different sources and there is no need to enter >> them manually (error prone, tedious) >> ViewTemplates can be used as you did, and one can decide what to show and >> how to show fields. >> >> While I think bibliography on the web and hypertext media can be totally >> different, do you think sticking to some standards is better or not? >> I do not have a specific opinion here and I want to see what is the best >> solution! >> > > I haven't used the ref-management part of Refnotes. I don't think it would > work with the framework I've set up from what I can see because I want > sources to be first-class citizens with their own tiddlers. I don't usually > do inline citations because I tend to paraphrase and generalize quite a bit > (though there are exceptions). And while I like BibTeX, I don't think I > read enough articles from sources that provide bibliography downloads to > make it more efficient than entering the couple of fields I care about > myself. > > Still, thanks for the reminder about this plugin -- I've found the > footnotes very useful in the past and I could see that bibliography > mechanism being helpful in the future. > > >> 25:38 The Write tab highlights fruitful areas for further work (stubs, >>> missing, needing attention, needing excision, to-dos, open questions) >>> 29:58 The Reference Explorer shows related tiddlers (backlinks and >>> forward links) in a concise table >>> >> >> Wonderful! While I think not all tiddlers need that! I saw it can be >> customized >> > > Curious – what tiddlers do you think don't need a link summary? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/56770607-6adf-42b5-bf01-74ec46ea6bd0n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/56770607-6adf-42b5-bf01-74ec46ea6bd0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMBPg%3DpJGKRvBiT2TO%2BKjCjvEKPXjmg%2Bcb7GBvOfipmOsw%40mail.gmail.com.
