On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 8:48:36 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: It seems to me that these smart fields would lesser the need to have json > data. Or maybe we could just have fields store json data and get methods > for accessing json au part of the core? Thus, we would be able to handle > them but also json in the text field, which is only a field like other.
If we want user-facing wikitext functions that can handle JSON, imo we would need a "schema", that defines the behavior. This is 1 level "higher" than my previous thoughts. just brainstorming. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b59a1205-bf70-4a7d-8dbd-b4d64ca9eb95n%40googlegroups.com.
