On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 12:26:30 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: > ".." is commonly used in describing a continuation, for instance 3..7 is > for 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
> IMO the proposed use of .. is then counter-intuitive. > I don't think so. We probably don't use field names 3..7. We use field-name..meta-data ... I don't see a problem there. Everything else dosn't look good, is forbidden or is hard to write. If we use dots in regexp, we need to escape them anyway. So there shouldn't be a problem with regexps. just my thoughts. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/09684b6b-a4c0-45c2-b01c-25441a3f051cn%40googlegroups.com.
