TW Tones wrote: > ... I do not see why we cant document this so anyone of any skill, can > find where or how to style or restyle any element in tiddlywiki. >
It is an interesting issue. In my understanding the CSS (cascade) in TW is quite rich. But actually very logically additive. Much cleaner than is often the case for websites. That is a lot to with how classes in CSS relate to its HTML architecture. *HOW to explicate this better? **Not sure.* One comment: I found studying what Thomas Elmiger does in his BRICKS plugin immensely informative because he slices up "Vanilla" into smaller units that clarifies a lot what is going on in the "cascade". The other, more widely used approach I think, is using browser "inspector" tools whilst coding. That has immediate upsides. BUT also can have its own problems in that dynamic use of CSS can confuse the picture even with that. Just comments TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0932b5a4-6774-459b-8e0a-7602777e4561n%40googlegroups.com.
