Thanks for the iniciative and the work. - I think that put only name attribute could be confused for newcomers. They can think that widgets work like a macro, when (I think that) the widget works like a html tag. - I am rethinking the idea of create a syntax example for each widget or macro. Maybe it is better try to do it in the widget documentation, in the tiddler *Widgets in WikiText*, and then create a line in each widget linking this tiddler. And the point "Widget attributes can be specified as:" will be more helpful.
My idea would look something like this (Using some doc macro), but I was thinking in macros. \define tag-init() < \define tag-end() > <pre><<tag-init>><<.wid Mywidget>> ''attribute1''="value1" //attribute1//="value1"<<tag-end>> CONTENT <<tag-init>>/<<.wid Mywidget>><<tag-end>> </pre> But it doesn't look good (in color-contrast) in the name of widget/macro. And i don't know if it is cofused or not, maybe I need apply the style to all string of attribute ( attributeX="valueX"). Or Maybe we don't need if we use a table with column "type" as use Mohammad in their macros. El jueves, 27 de mayo de 2021 a las 8:56:35 UTC+2, TiddlyTweeter escribió: > Mohammad wrote: > >> I have attached a sample doc from Excel >> >> The same sequence: purpose, syntax, arguments (in/out parameters), >> remarks, examples >> > > [image: Screenshot 2021-05-27 085252.jpg] > > Ha. Very good example! > > And, YES. We are all Sinners, and especially Microsoft :-) > > TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c0430e88-6358-4cdb-83fd-f401f73c83b3n%40googlegroups.com.
