> TiddlyTweeter wrote: > >> ... using either *<$reveal>... *or <details>... to hide sections so its >> not too overwhelming and the end-user can expand only the sections they >> need to see. > > PMario replied:
> At the moment Jeremy doesn't accept PRs that contain the <details> > element, because it doesn't store open/close state. > I think, we need a <$details> widget, that can handle persistent state, > in the core first. > HA!* <details> *is super simple. ADD "open" or remove it. * Should be a doddle. * It is NOT intelligent like *<$reveal> *which handles well complex situations, but in MANY use cases <details> binary sate is all you need. Side comment TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5732410c-2ce9-452e-a986-3057a5e8171dn%40googlegroups.com.
