Ciao TW Tones I hear you.
AND I do SEE that GG got impoverished ... recently the following ... - Easy ability to email a poster privately went AWOL ... - CODE blocks just disappeared - Ability to RE-EDIT posts went away - Taggery is mainly currently pointless (complex issue in TW on any platform) - *and more ...* That is a LOT practically. That said, MY view now is focused on *can I FIND what I need when I need it?* YOUR EXIT approach is interesting. Simply from my previous experience I'm inclined to the view we NEED first to prove GG is a total heap of problems for OUR needs. OR provide an additive method to FIND. Just thoughts TT On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 09:50:48 UTC+2 TW Tones wrote: > TT, > > I was just reviewing the concept of exit strategy. I am running a test on > a group I own. Google permits you to export most information they hold for > you and this seems to include ALL mail in a google group. It would most > likely be "big data" but it can be done it seems. Then with this available > it may be possible to algorithmically or crowd source curation of the data > for the backbone of a new solution. The key issue is separating content > inside emails, such as with reply and forwarding where a whole or part of > the conversation accrues in the text of each email but it is not > insurmountable. It may also be possible to get something out of the mail > archive. > > I am not pretending this is easy, and a concerted effort and project would > need to be mounted. > > Regards > Tones > > On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 16:22:46 UTC+10 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > >> TW Tones wrote: >> >>> ... It is true there are a lot of good ideas but its like herding cats >>> and always will be unless there were a clear leader as a replacement. >>> >> >> Lol! Right! Herding cats? Non-starter! >> >> You probably read my last two posts. >> Actually rather than focus on exit strategies I got kinda interested in >> *whether >> we can leverage here better?* >> >> What does seem very clear is that in the native web interface in this GG >> is totally inadequate to easy probe of its own history. >> >> I think this is an empirical matter. *HOW do you FIND what you need?* >> >> IF we could more accurately probe the archives it would address a big >> section of the problematic. >> >> Thoughts >> TT >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dc68e89c-fcd3-4047-91d0-32608a00d314n%40googlegroups.com.
