[email protected] wrote: > ... easily searchable and while I am sure there maybe better alternatives > out there, I personally just do not see the benefit in moving the entire > community to a new platform
*Very interesting post *except "easily searchable". NO, Google Groups search is TERRIBLE. And WORSE than it was before. And that is a MAJOR factor in end-user frustration. Please prove me wrong. *Show some complex searches that work? *:-) > ... "if it ain't broke don't fix it". RIGHT! BUT. It is LESS than it WAS. The recent changes in GG function removed many functions and added NOTHING new. Basically it is increasingly impoverished on functions. > ... what alternatives are available but are they as time tested and > reliable? ... Google Groups, in net history, took over from Usenet and also adopted ListServ stuff. I have no doubt that will continue. That is NOT our primary concern. The ISSUE now is to what extent the current GG supports what *WE need*. My (original) question was really about OPTIMISATION *IS what we use everyday what we have already, or something new**?* Just a question, TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6e143e54-2a14-4a57-b5ee-4188e4862691n%40googlegroups.com.
