[email protected] wrote: > Ok. I get what you’re saying now. I thought about such an approach, but > doing so would exponentially increase the loading speed of the tool. I > figure that it’s best to leave each thread as a tiddler. > Imagine if the entire GG were converted. Instead of maybe 20,000 > threads/tiddlers, it could have over 100,000. I imagine this could lead to > even further issues in TW itself. >
OK, so the idea with your project is to convert the entire GG archive then? Actually, is the purpose to make a searchable archive? The discussion you refer to in your initial post is about replacing GG with something, in other words a "discussion solution", is this somehow something you have in mind? Or is this more a PoC that threads can be scraped and tiddlified? (which, of course, also is super cool and a probably a needed component in a more encompassing solution :-) <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/df145bc7-ab11-4729-aec8-5dd7047f3f18n%40googlegroups.com.
