Ciao ludwa6 Slightly in a different direction, but strongly related, is fact that computer science is UNDER appreciative of cognitive variations.
Meaning and pattern finding is an infinite human activity that existed long before computers or modern ideas of what is "kosher". It is certainly true that some kind of typology of different strategies in HOW ONE LEARNS & RECORDS is useful. But, to be honest, our current usual models on the net are somewhat crude to what human beings actually do, which is vast, in many directions. Just thoughts :-) TT On Friday, 18 June 2021 at 18:36:29 UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote: > Came across this article today > <http://blog.dornea.nu/2021/06/13/note-taking-in-2021/> via HackerNews > (where it has sparked quite a lively comment thread > <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27513008>), which brought me to > realise something about an inner tension i have been struggling for too > long to reconcile: it's about the difference between NoteTAKING vs > NoteMAKING (or DigitalGardening or MindMapping or ZettelKasten or PKMS or > whatever you want to call it) -two modalities of work that are so > fundamentally different, the idea of trying to do both with the same tool > might just never work, period. > > Interestingly, author Victor Dorneau keeps his own Zettelkasten in > TiddlyWiki, citing @Soren B's as his inspiration (GMTA ;-)...And tho his > NoteTaking/GTD system is rather more complicated than i would like (it > involves Emacs ORG mode and some proprietary mobile app, from which he > extracts & converts data to XML via a "simple" Golang script), i completely > resonate with the principle: while one's NoteMAKING tool should be > optimised for "Intertwingularity" -as TiddlyWiki of course is- one's > NoteTAKING tool should optimised for maximum speed & portability. > > So, i'm now back to using Dynalist for agile NoteTaking, exporting my > workfile at day's end as plain text, and copy/pasting it into a new Journal > tiddler in TW for integration. Crude, but effective enough, albeit with > some editing overhead in TW that it would be nice to eliminate. Am > starting to explore the possibilities of Logseq as a potential Dynalist > replacement; it does outlining in much the same way, but has some > interesting export functions, including JSON and Roam JSON. If there were > a way in TW to import such exports and convert them into proper tiddlers... > That would be amazing! > > If anyone else has got some other solution for agile NoteTaking that > integrates nicely with TiddlyWiki for NoteMaking, i'd be very interested to > hear about it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fa56f042-d257-4c9b-8500-5d2f4e630413n%40googlegroups.com.
