Folks, This issue, with the different forms of a word such as foot and feet when it comes to searching or linking is no doubt a problem that has occurred before. I would not be surprised if there were data sets one could import for English at least to search for equivalents. Once found a simple click could commit it to a local version of the larger dataset, such that you could remove the larger data set before publishing your wiki (or not including in the published wiki) and have the feature continue to work.
Tones On Tuesday, 29 June 2021 at 08:51:47 UTC+10 Si wrote: > Ahh OK that shouldn't have confused me as much as it did... > > >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work > for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) > ... > > IMO this isn't that much of a problem. If the filter was added by the > user, they would understand the limitations of it. > > On Monday, 28 June 2021 at 23:41:39 UTC+1 PMario wrote: > >> On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 9:13:16 PM UTC+2 Si wrote: >> >>> >>> The problem is, that I would need to add a generic way. It may work >>> for your, but an other user would probably have fun to link to [[foot]] ;) >>> ... >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here! Is "[[foot]]" an >>> autocorrect error? >>> >> >> foot -> feet ... It was just an example where a "hack" breaks down. >> >> I was thinking about the "irregular" forms that are easy for humans but >> problematic for algorithms. >> >> -m >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/db19164b-316a-4f98-8e62-dfd0b2fb3a84n%40googlegroups.com.
