I also use mGSD, and I've adopted some conventions to help me keep things semi-separate (beginning Areas, Projects, Tesks, etc. with different characters: $, +, ., etc. ). Definitely not perfect... *sigh*
On Mar 26, 4:25 am, jdunham <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been using mGSD (nee MonkeyGTD) for well over a year now and > loving it. I had trouble upgrading before, and finally I sucked it up > and separated all of my own content tiddlers from the application > tiddlers so that I could just start over with a fresh mGSD template. > Doing it by hand in a text editor seemed like the easiest way, even > though it took me about 2 hours (about 875 content tiddlers). > > Of course I used a downloaded mGSD file for the new TW, and now I > realize it will be difficult to put everything back onto tiddlyspot > because I should have imported my content into an mGSD+tiddlyspot > template, but that's not the real question. > > The real question is whether it would be easy or even feasible to keep > my own tiddler content in a separate area or even *gasp* a separate > file from the TW and all its plugins? It would make it so much easier > to test different plug-ins and themes and beta versions without > putting one's data at risk. > > For me, tiddlers I write are entirely different from the javascript- > based tiddlers which drive the system or add cool features, and mixing > them all together just seems to add risk and confusion. I'm fine with > them all being tiddlers, but storing them all in one tangled, > alphabetized mass is undesirable for me. > > Is there a solution to this, or is it worth me working on one? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
