I would recomment MasterIncludesPlugin, if you don't use your TW on a server:
http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Including_External_Content Regards. On 26 Mrz., 19:02, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > I normally group my data via tags, and use ELS's import tiddlers > plugin to import via tag group. > I think tiddlytweaker can also help with adding tags in bulk. . > .http://www.tiddlytools.com > (sorry for lack of a direct link, on my phone) > > that has been my solution so far. . . > > Mike > > On Mar 26, 12:07 pm, ebullient <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I also use mGSD, and I've adopted some conventions to help me keep > > things semi-separate (beginning Areas, Projects, Tesks, etc. with > > different characters: $, +, ., etc. ). Definitely not perfect... > > *sigh* > > > On Mar 26, 4:25 am, jdunham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have been using mGSD (nee MonkeyGTD) for well over a year now and > > > loving it. I had trouble upgrading before, and finally I sucked it up > > > and separated all of my own content tiddlers from the application > > > tiddlers so that I could just start over with a fresh mGSD template. > > > Doing it by hand in a text editor seemed like the easiest way, even > > > though it took me about 2 hours (about 875 content tiddlers). > > > > Of course I used a downloaded mGSD file for the new TW, and now I > > > realize it will be difficult to put everything back onto tiddlyspot > > > because I should have imported my content into an mGSD+tiddlyspot > > > template, but that's not the real question. > > > > The real question is whether it would be easy or even feasible to keep > > > my own tiddler content in a separate area or even *gasp* a separate > > > file from the TW and all its plugins? It would make it so much easier > > > to test different plug-ins and themes and beta versions without > > > putting one's data at risk. > > > > For me, tiddlers I write are entirely different from the javascript- > > > based tiddlers which drive the system or add cool features, and mixing > > > them all together just seems to add risk and confusion. I'm fine with > > > them all being tiddlers, but storing them all in one tangled, > > > alphabetized mass is undesirable for me. > > > > Is there a solution to this, or is it worth me working on one? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
