I don't think this is a "tag problem". It is a more routine issue: "How do I carve the Universe" :-)
This is not about systems. It is about thinking. At root, I believe :-). We tend to focus here on gizmode-ology :-) But actually a lot of the issues are really about conceptualization of one's info space. Just saying TT On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 17:29:38 UTC+2 Stobot wrote: > I've seen this come up from time to time on the forums - and Tones > mentioned it recently How to make a more convenient method for selecting > tags? (google.com) > <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/mMFBKZ1tbAo/m/cE2Ys3yfBgAJ> > > I agree with most of the points of where fields are more useful than tags > as you get deeper and deeper into organization, and the methods make sense, > but often there's talk about a performance implication that I don't > understand, but am hoping to as I'm kind of a performance junkie. > > So my questions are: > 1. Is the "bad" type of "tag pollution" related to number of unique tags, > or number of tiddlers *with* tags? Or both? For example I use my main > TiddlyWiki for project organization and most details are in fields, but > almost every tiddler is tagged as either a task, project, meeting, etc. So, > I have a small number of unique tags, but high number of tagged items. > 2. What is the source of the associated negative performance impact? I > assume it has something to do with indexing - and if so there's probably a > speed vs. memory tradeoff. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0ae56012-3e95-4a73-b572-32229c8d99cdn%40googlegroups.com.
