Soren Bjornstad wrote: > Some of you all might be interested in this new post on my blog: > > > https://controlaltbackspace.org/notes/better-indexes-through-semantic-modeling/
It was well worth reading! *THE GOOD* Great example of logical working through to a satisfactory outcome. I complimented you before that your use of *visual illustrations* helps earth the discussion really well! I think they definitely help folk who are not so versed in the conceptual matrix you lay out. *THE BAD* TBH your comments about the Old Media of Books are simply inaccurate. The Book has had (when required) very *good *indexing where authors chose to do it. Think about the richness of the indices of Roget's Thesaurus. Think about all those Biblical things that Dave Gifford and several million other Christians sweat over. Their CONCORDANCES has been a venerable partner in print works for a very long time. *THE UGLY* Nothing. Your basic thing is additive. The Good the Bad & The Ugly <https://youtu.be/aJCSNIl2Pls?t=164> Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dc1bf52e-d4a5-4d56-b7a7-2bfc088c7581n%40googlegroups.com.
