I admit that I wasn't sure about a seperator - untill I saw the css arrows (delicious style) I think that would be awesome
I haven't had time to look into this yet, and probably won't for a while. CSS wizardry contributions (or research into prior art) would be most welcome...
The new css border styling looks good + it's much cleaner than hard- coding, semantically useless separators.
So should we settle for that until someone comes along to implement those fancy image-less arrows?
To ensure tiddlers included using IncludePlugin are listed, it would be good if the first line of the getTiddlers function could use reverseLookup
Is there any particular reason why the IncludePlugin doesn't support getTiddlers - it sounds like perhaps it should? (I'm not intimately familiar with that particular plugin.)
I've also added a cross after the tags by amending refreshTags
As previously mentioned, I'm not too keen on adding magic characters for presentational purposes, so I probably won't adopt this change. (Though I gotta admit that I currently don't have a better solution.) Of course it's perfectly fine for you to keep your own little fork. You might want to amend the Name slice though to avoid confusion.
-- F. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
