LOL, yeah, as PMario points out, a new feature was just introduced for *exactly* that.
Another CSS hair-puller is when I sometimes test styling by using local styleblocks. A local styleblock is obviously superior to avoid going back and forth between a dedicated stylesheet tiddler. Well, on some occasions things mysteriously don't work... and, much hair later, it turns out the styling *demands *a dedicated stylesheet to work. It makes no sense to me, but OK, c'est la vie. Just like baldness. My avatar indicates how much CSS I've fumbled around with. <:-) On Tuesday, December 14, 2021 at 6:05:25 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > I just spent the last hour trying to figure out why some CSS wasn't > working. > > My TiddlyWiki has 3 CSS tiddlers. > > The CSS in "Tiddler B" has nothing wrong with it at all. > > Turns out that the CSS in "Tiddler B" was not getting applied because the > last line of CSS in "Tiddler A" was missing a lousy "}". So all of the > styling in Tiddler A was being applied, but the styling in Tiddler B was > not happening because of the missing "}" at the end of Tiddler A. > > So heads up. What may seem like a problem with CSS in one tiddler may > actually be an issue with the CSS in some other tiddler. > > Now, how to reattach all of this hair ... > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d2a886e1-b5ba-4980-8c96-cded5ece11dfn%40googlegroups.com.
