Hi cj.v, thanks for your response. I'm also pretty sure that in every Wiki-Software you have an issue if more people editing one tiddler (to stay in the language of tiddlywiki) at the same time. In TiddlyWiki you have this issue if two or more people just editing different tiddler at the same time. You always open and save the whole wiki.
I guess - or better hope - that there is an solution to reduce this problem to the general problem of one tiddler. And yes - we are also looking for other solutions like MediaWiki, DokuWiki etc.. Notion is a new idea - thank you for that. We will have a look on it. Benedikt [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 19. Februar 2022 um 03:08:20 UTC+1: > G'day Benedikt, > > I know of no wiki that allows real simultaneous editing kind of > collaboration like we would find simultaneously editing a Google Doc, for > example. (If you've never done that, it is really worth experiencing. It > is awesome. Whether it be Google Docs or whatever else that has the same > collaborative goodness.) > > I'm pretty sure with every wiki product, you can easily run into one > person unintentionally overwriting somebody else's edits. Them are the > breaks. > > All of that aside, if you can get a techie to set you up with a small > nodejs server with a TiddlyWiki, there are ways to setup some tricks to > eliminate overwriting issues via mechanisms such that only the author of a > tiddler can edit it, and everybody else can only enter comments, comments > treated as task items which the author can act on to update a tiddler. > > It is possible that TiddlyWiki is not the best way to go for collaborative > project/knowledge/whatever management, and some other tool might be best > for the job IF you don't need either of TiddlyWiki's transclusion or > filtering capabilities. To me, there is nothing out there that can come > close to matching those two capabilities in TiddlyWiki. (I can't imagine > good project/knowledge/whatever management without transclusion à la > TiddlyWiki.) > > Notion might be worth looking at for the giggles. I find it very nice in > a "everthing-works-out-of-the-box(?)" way. Transclusion is "okay". Could > be a way for multiple folk to collaborate on the next versions of the > tiddlers in your TiddlyWiki, which one person "owns" (re responsibility of > updating it). Or maybe some kind of frankenbeast-marrying of the one > TiddlyWiki with Notion (or something else, whether online or local-network.) > > > > > > On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 11:24:17 AM UTC-4 [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm using TiddlyWiki for some years as my personal knowledge-base and I >> love it. >> >> I'm also a member of a community for Multiprojektmanagement. I've shown >> my TiddlyWiki to my peers and they like it. >> Now we have the idea to use Tiddly Wiki as our shared knowledge-base. >> Is there an easy way for setting up a Multiuser TiddlyWiki where everyone >> can read and write, in best case simultaneously? >> >> I found Tiddlyhost - but it seems that only the owner can save changes. >> I read about a MultiUser-Plugin for Node-js. But we are no "techis" and >> have no idea how to set up TiddlyWiki in a node.js. >> If I store it simply in a cloud and two users open the file, only the >> last save is stored. The second user is not informed that someone else is >> working on it. >> >> What we are looking for is a wiki, stored in a cloud like sharepoint, >> onedrive, ... with Multiuser-Capabilities. >> >> Thanks for any ideas >> >> Benedikt >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2ec373a2-7b8b-4bfe-8b72-7c1ee441b2dbn%40googlegroups.com.
