Have you tried Bob? You can get around all the setup by using the executable version. The newest version is here https://github.com/OokTech/TW5-BobEXE/releases/tag/1.7.3b1
Just download the executable for your system, put it in a folder and run it. On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 6:56:50 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > G'day Benedikt, > > Although I believe TiddlyWiki is the cat's meow and then some, I think > Notion is always worth looking at even if just to look at. > > To me, Notion seems like the no fuss no muss quick way of setting > something up IF you don't need all of the power and flexibility of > TiddlyWiki. > > All of that aside ... > > I often tell folk: "to look at me, you may think the hamster is dead, but > the wheels are always spinning." > > I've various TiddlyWiki experiments on the go, one being a nodejs > TiddlyWiki "Farm" on a server. The other is the idea of single-file > TiddlyWiki instances acting as clients and/or servers (or peer-to-peer > TiddlyWiki instances) all "talking" to each other with help from a web > browser's local storage (all of those TiddlyWiki instances needing to be in > the same physical place/domain.) > > Mashups. Oh how I love them... > > I'm thinking of playing this afternoon with humble beginnings of a > single-file-instances TiddlyWiki "Farm" communication/sharing with each > other via local storage. > > Stay tuned. (Maybe I'll have something today, might take me a few days to > demonstrate something in a YouTube video.) > > (If this has been done by anybody already, please let us know so that I > don't go reinventing the wheel ! Or inventing a rickety wheel when > there's a muscle car out there ...) > > On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 9:22:13 AM UTC-4 [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi cj.v, >> >> thanks for your response. >> I'm also pretty sure that in every Wiki-Software you have an issue if >> more people editing one tiddler (to stay in the language of tiddlywiki) at >> the same time. >> In TiddlyWiki you have this issue if two or more people just editing >> different tiddler at the same time. You always open and save the whole wiki. >> >> I guess - or better hope - that there is an solution to reduce this >> problem to the general problem of one tiddler. >> >> And yes - we are also looking for other solutions >> like MediaWiki, DokuWiki etc.. Notion is a new idea - thank you for that. >> We will have a look on it. >> >> Benedikt >> >> >> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 19. Februar 2022 um 03:08:20 UTC+1: >> >>> G'day Benedikt, >>> >>> I know of no wiki that allows real simultaneous editing kind of >>> collaboration like we would find simultaneously editing a Google Doc, for >>> example. (If you've never done that, it is really worth experiencing. It >>> is awesome. Whether it be Google Docs or whatever else that has the same >>> collaborative goodness.) >>> >>> I'm pretty sure with every wiki product, you can easily run into one >>> person unintentionally overwriting somebody else's edits. Them are the >>> breaks. >>> >>> All of that aside, if you can get a techie to set you up with a small >>> nodejs server with a TiddlyWiki, there are ways to setup some tricks to >>> eliminate overwriting issues via mechanisms such that only the author of a >>> tiddler can edit it, and everybody else can only enter comments, comments >>> treated as task items which the author can act on to update a tiddler. >>> >>> It is possible that TiddlyWiki is not the best way to go for >>> collaborative project/knowledge/whatever management, and some other tool >>> might be best for the job IF you don't need either of TiddlyWiki's >>> transclusion or filtering capabilities. To me, there is nothing out there >>> that can come close to matching those two capabilities in TiddlyWiki. (I >>> can't imagine good project/knowledge/whatever management without >>> transclusion à la TiddlyWiki.) >>> >>> Notion might be worth looking at for the giggles. I find it very nice >>> in a "everthing-works-out-of-the-box(?)" way. Transclusion is "okay". >>> Could be a way for multiple folk to collaborate on the next versions of the >>> tiddlers in your TiddlyWiki, which one person "owns" (re responsibility of >>> updating it). Or maybe some kind of frankenbeast-marrying of the one >>> TiddlyWiki with Notion (or something else, whether online or local-network.) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 11:24:17 AM UTC-4 [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I'm using TiddlyWiki for some years as my personal knowledge-base and I >>>> love it. >>>> >>>> I'm also a member of a community for Multiprojektmanagement. I've shown >>>> my TiddlyWiki to my peers and they like it. >>>> Now we have the idea to use Tiddly Wiki as our shared knowledge-base. >>>> Is there an easy way for setting up a Multiuser TiddlyWiki where >>>> everyone can read and write, in best case simultaneously? >>>> >>>> I found Tiddlyhost - but it seems that only the owner can save changes. >>>> I read about a MultiUser-Plugin for Node-js. But we are no "techis" and >>>> have no idea how to set up TiddlyWiki in a node.js. >>>> If I store it simply in a cloud and two users open the file, only the >>>> last save is stored. The second user is not informed that someone else is >>>> working on it. >>>> >>>> What we are looking for is a wiki, stored in a cloud like sharepoint, >>>> onedrive, ... with Multiuser-Capabilities. >>>> >>>> Thanks for any ideas >>>> >>>> Benedikt >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4be12a7a-df2b-4350-b538-04389c11f011n%40googlegroups.com.
