I left off a search example:

Right now "wave peak" only shows these other tiddlers, the changelog we 
generate between versions which is not broken up this way because it 
doesn't need a lot of interspersed user content, and some other generated 
content related to coding systems for data interchange which have it as a 
literal and again, aren't structured to be interspersed with user content 
(at the moment)

[image: wave peak.PNG]

On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 9:55:15 AM UTC-6 Cade Roux wrote:

> The system tiddlers do not show up in the search normally (I think because 
> they are system tiddlers).  But the content we are looking for is inside 
> those tiddlers.
>
> The "Mitral valve|Doppler" tiddler does exist as a normal tiddler, its 
> only content is the <<measurement>> macro which uses the template to make 
> all the content, using fields in the tiddler and transcludes of tiddlers 
> based on name
>
> [image: MitralTiddler.PNG]
>
> This is one of the data table tiddlers used in it that contains useful 
> search content:
>
> [image: MitralTextTiddler.PNG]
>
> That table of data is fully generated by the build, and itself can 
> transclude user-entered comments using that trans-edit macro.  For 
> instance, the "$:/ascend/Text.Measurement.View.description:Name=Mitral 
> valve|Doppler" is the user-entered tiddler of comments about the View 
> column in the Measurement table for Mitral Valve | Doppler measurements.  
> Such tiddlers may or may not exist.  In "edit-mode" the informatics 
> specialist can click on "Edit" or "Missing" and either edit them or create 
> any missing notes on that item.  So that content also, we would like to 
> show up in the search.  And we can tell from the name of those fragment 
> tiddlers which the primary Measurement tiddler it eventually bubbles up to.
>
> I probably picked a bad example because there aren't any comments on that 
> data.  This is the final render of the page.  I circled most of the 
> transcludes and you can see the inner transcludes.
>
> [image: MitralComplete.PNG]
>
> So for instance, if someone right now searches for "wave peak", they don't 
> get any useful results because it's in the system tiddlers, but we'd like 
> it to show this tiddler as a result, because the content contains it.  If 
> one of those "Missing" user-edited transcludes contains some content, we'd 
> also like those to be searched and this main tiddler to show up in the 
> results.
>
> I hope that makes it a little more clear.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cade
>
> On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 8:20:25 AM UTC-6 PMario wrote:
>
>> Hi Cade,
>>
>> Can you show a screenshot of the search dialogue, where it finds content 
>> in a system tiddler? .. Is this possible to share?
>>
>> I'll do a quick summary, to see if I do understand it right. .. 
>> Everything works will except of search. 
>>
>> Search finds content from auto created "inner" / shadow tiddlers. 
>> But clicking the link should open the "outer" template which basically 
>> shows a transcluded list of auto-created and user-created content. 
>>
>> I think it should be possible to create a "link-catcher" configuration 
>> the filters out the prefix and links to the name only. 
>>
>> So one of your "outer" tiddlers is: "Mitral valve|Doppler"  
>> This tiddler exists. So it is a real tiddler. right?
>>
>> Do your system tiddlers eg: 
>> "$:/ascend/XText.Measurement.stcodes:Name=Mitral valve|Doppler" have a 
>> caption-field? or do they show up with the full title in the search 
>> results? 
>>
>> As written an example of a search result dropdown would be needed. 
>>
>> -mario
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3ae10586-bf85-456b-8636-c13e0a406485n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to