Hi again, PMario, I understand your points and support pretty much all of them.
First of all... > (1)yes it did [sound harsh] Again, I did not mean to be offensive towards whomever spent a lot of time and effort to provide us with TiddlyHub. But I do think that it did not turn out to become what it may just strive to be. On the other hand, I guess that parts of its codebase can very likely be used by / integrated into / ported to TiddlySpace or TiddlyHoster. When it comes to repos, the answer probably lies in who maintains / administers / moderates the list(s). Again, I would not know who that is ...or should be. As for collecting info's on plugins etc... automation sure is a much desired feature (which TiddlyHub does use for "registered" repos). > And that's why my desire is, to have a mechanism to get notified per tiddler, > if needed. That is precisely what I meant with "as atomic as it could be". When it comes to grouping things... I am very much with you. No need to disconnect or generalize things that actually are meant to be interwoven. > Even with my mechanism it needs more than one space to introduce a new plugin. Sure! That is especially true if one does not wish to ship info- tiddlers along with plugins (or plugin-spaces) meant for inclusion. > I have no problem with more library spaces. Agreed. Whatever is worthy of its own identity might eventually be a space ...especially when inclusion is only possible on a space level. For that reason, I would definetly want to have presentation (theme), info (documentation) and modules (plugins) be seperate entities in (a) TiddlySpace... just as html, css and javascript are way more structured, hence powerful when seperated. Meaning, though one would want to include a module or plugin, one does not wish to include how it is being documented or presented. > not just another (poorly maintained) collection. ... Commenting myself... of course, whichever "server" is in the repo-list of TiddlyHub will likely be able to provide updates. What, in fact, I was referring to is probably my own laziness to register contributions with TiddlyHub... which may be due to my superficial judgement that people are not really using it that much ...which, in turn, may just be due to it being way too losely providing community features ...though indeed allowing to rate or comment. On the other hand, I don't find TiddlyHub being much promoted as the #1 spot to look for plugins and other enhancements to TiddlyWiki. Would you think it should be? > I don't think, that there will be all plugins ported to the new platform. If there were a somewhat integrated, community driven portal, I do believe that all that is relevant to someone will indeed get listed there... interactively... with people being able to discuss, comment, rate, collaborate, fork, etc... collaborative features no TiddlyWiki.org could possibly provide. Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
