I think the whole set of notions about slices, sections, fields, and tags needs a careful re-evaluation. The pros and cons of each of these alternatives should be enumerated and summarized. It may be that some methods should be consolidated, and perhaps other ways be made more robust, such as to support truly semantic tagging (see thread here [1]).
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/b501b9832122e775/fa4658e56659fcae?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=semantic+tag#fa4658e56659fcae On Oct 11, 5:01 pm, Tobias Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say, for quite a few properties, using fields is a much more > native apporach as compared to tagging. That way, one could reserve > tagging for keywords and meta-information ...instead of using tags for > certain "logical properties". > > There are a few solutions outthere that make use of fields or allow > you to to aggregate tiddlers that fulfil certain field criteria, such > as "has-field" or "has-field-value" ...while the underlying > information is somewhat hidden from the general UI, yet still > accessible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
