On Nov 10, 6:57 pm, Yakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, that's it. One more question, thought. Those comments-based
> wrappings (/*{{{*/) make me think that StyleSheet is rendered as usual
> CSS - but in this case I don't understand why
>
> /*{{{*/
> [some CSS]
> /*}}}*/
> /*{{{*/
> [more CSS]
> /*}}}*/
>
> works so that "more CSS" is not applied. Any ideas?
The above example will work. But may be your real CSS wont. If you'd
provide a link to a short testcase (real CSS) it would help.
> Also this seems to mean that I can use any other wrapper like
>
> /*{{myClass{*/
> [CSS]
> /*}}}*/
I wouldn't do this. The first */ will be rendered. If you need a
different style change the <pre> or/and <code> definitions in your
StyleSheet.
> /*"""*/
> [CSS]
> /*"""*/
>
> I think I'll try some such tricks.
See above.
=======
If you do something like this
/*{{{*/
.button { display: block;}
/*}}}*/
some comment
/*{{{*/
.button { display: block;}
/*}}}*/
It will not work, because "some comment" is no comment! The browser
treats everything, which is not covered inside /* ... */ as CSS
commands, and "some comment" is not valid. Most of the time, the rest
of the tiddler is ignored, by the >>browser<<
The only thing, that tw does, is, that it renders something like this
/*{{{*/
.button { display: block;}
/*}}}*/
as a <pre> block, to get a better view. But the above has to be valid
CSS !!!
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
