Thanks Hans, your explication gives what i asked for.. and thanks for the plugin, that I used already. The reason is to align and facilate the entering of new tiddlers.
The Datastructure needs much more refering tags than tiddlers - if the answer is "no" the only solution will be with fields and pregiven listboxes for selecting the tags. To refer to 1000 tiddlers the data will include probably 3000 to 5000 tags or taggins. Cheers On 13 Jul., 14:35, HansBKK <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand so I'll try to re-phrase what I think you're > asking: > > Is it possible to store some of a tiddler's tags in an alternative field and > still have all the native functionality of tagging as if they were all > stored in the usual field? > > Please let us know if the above is different from what you're asking. > > This forum has had past threads that have discussed having a division > between "system" or "backstage" tags, to be used for application > functionality separate from "user" or "content" tags, but as far as I know > the answer is "no", or at least it would take a significant amount of > development effort. > > However this fine pluginhttp://tagsearch.tiddlyspot.comwill allow you to > group your tags by function in the user interface, definitely helps me to > keep my 1000+ tags sorted, only displaying the top 50 or so in a half-dozen > groups, but allowing users to quickly search for the remainder. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
