On 17 Nov., 14:07, [email protected] wrote: > You get people who "believe" in XML and probably once thought XSLT was > going make everything okay and if we can get tiddlers to fit in that > world, all the rest kind of falls out.
Initially, I actually designed giewiki to be delivered as XML + XSLT, but I eventually went back to classic HTML mostly because of the flaws in IE's implementation. You can still get the XML version with a URL query string, though. My point about UUID's was that strictly speaking, you really need to know what it is that the uuid identifies, and that's a semantic issue. I could imagine that a collection of tiddlers had the same value for a named uuid, because either: * they were different versions of the same tiddler. * they originated from the same server or page. * they were authored by the same person. * or ... or ... Not to deconstruct too much, my point remains that we should try agree on two things: 1) What the tiddler-identifying id is named (simple). 2) What it means to have identified a tiddler. Not so simple. IMHO. If, say, you receive a document that contains 42 more or less different tiddlers having 17 different uuids, what can be deduced about their relationships..? A plausible interpretation would be 17 tiddlers, some of which have several versions. You may of course choose not to accept such a document. Or try to figure out which is the current version - but don't assume that it's the one with the latest timestamp. /Poul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
