On Monday, January 14, 2013 7:13:12 AM UTC-5, Scott Simmons wrote: > > Interesting — though not directly relevant to my woes, unless I'm > misunderstanding. > > Assuming /*[[TranscludedStyleSheet]]*/ would appear in the main > StyleSheet, how would you ever know there was a transclusion issue? > Wouldn't the /* and */ comment tags prevent the transclusion from being > executed by the TW core? >
Oh, *NOW* I see what you were saying, PM! Sorry for being a bit thick, but I had to see it in action after reading your post before it clicked. The prettylinks inside my comments are the root of my troubles. If I understand correctly, TW doesn't parse the contents of those comments as CSS — but the double brackets [[ and ]] *DO* tell TW's transclusion mechanism to reach out and pull in the contents of the prettylinked tiddlers. Non-CSS garbage from those tiddlers then causes trouble in the stylesheet. No prettylinks in the comments, no problems — which is why the TiddlyTools stylesheets don't encounter parsing problems, even though they use more complex transclusions than mine. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/zoKTQm8qwk4J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
