OK. thanks. Not being a programmer I didn't understand "transclusion". But anyway - it works!!
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:32:46 AM UTC, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Kev, > > I understand right, you are asking why you have two tiddlers, correct? > > Well, you are right that for a single custom search you can spare the > generic approach and directly use the "Google Search" tiddler replacing > each occurence of $1 with your google search ID. > > However, if you should ever want to use a second custom search you'll > probably be better of with the more generic approach using transclusion. > > So, as you said... the proposed "Google Seach" tiddler acts indeed more > like a "Template" whereas the tiddler whereever you embed the template > merely implements it, almost like calling a macro. > > Perhaps calling the template tiddler "IncludeGoogleSearch" or the likes > would clarify all of this. However, I would not call it GoogleSearchPlugin > since people might jump to the conclusion of tagging it "systemConfig" > which eventually will break the whole thing. > > Cheers, Tobias. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
