Correct me if I am wrong Eric, I am certain that browser issues are the same throughout TiddlyWiki versions. So a TiddlyWiki 2.2 should as well not save in FF14+. So, it's not so much that TiddlyWiki can catch up or circumvent recently imposed security measures but rather that with TiddlyFox for example (and TiddlyWiki5 in some perhaps not too distant future), new ways of storing tiddlers do emerge that are compliant with recent browser security guidelines.
Personally, I would as well appreciate these being optional - it should be under my control as a user, whether or not I dare take the risk of compromising my system when using supposedly insecure local file access in a, well, local context... regardless of whether something on my local system can also do some talking remotely. All in all, unless one keeps on using old browser versions for TiddlyWiki, this means that the old single file approach is literally coming to it's end in the sense that in order for it to work you do need some sort of either browser or server infrastructure to make TiddlyWiki persist changes - not unlike needing program x to save document y. While this may sound challenging, 'server infrastructure' may also mean something as 'simple' as hooking up to dropbox once and then being able to just use it or 'browser infrastructure' meaning instaling a browser plugin which these days (in chrome) can be distributed to all systems that sync to the same profile. Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
