Sorry I'm giving feedback way too late. I am one of those who has really big spaces (I have a private notebook of learning laws, about 15~17MB now and still counting). Working lazy loading mechanism would really help me a lot especially when I do layout/style editions and need to reload the page frequently, or when my Firefox blocking drag 'n' drops in textareas I need to restart even the whold browser again and again.
I depend on the TW environment too much so working directly on tiddlers in the static HTML level is not adequate for me. I have abandoned working online on TiddlySpace a couple of month ago and has been working on offline TSpace files and do importing back every couple week. But any news to the lazy loading for TSpace/TW classic would be appreciated, since I still love the feeling to retrieve and save every tiddler instantly on the web. I'm also depending too much on currently so many plugins of TW classic, so I'm not sure if switching to TW5 is a suitable option for me. Again many thanks to so many creators/contributors of TW/TSpace/plugins like Jeremy, Eric, Chris, Tobias, Simon Baird, Saq (just to name a few) etc. etc. Chris Dent於 2013年4月29日星期一UTC+8下午9時45分34秒寫道： > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Ruler11 wrote: > > On Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:55:42 AM UTC+4, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > >> > >> I believe that there is also an implementation of lazy loading for > >> TiddlySpace, but I don't have the details to hand. TW5 will have lazy > >> loading built in as part of the core. > > > > So any news on lazy loading now? > > The most recent lazy loading version of tiddlywiki for tiddlyspace > remains: > > http://apps.tiddlyspace.com/_tiddlywiki > > What it does is load up an empty framing for tiddlywiki and then loads > in the necessary parts from the server, a tiddler at a time. > > There hasn't been much work on it because the tiddlyspace server itself > has increased in speed and except for really big spaces, or really > slow connections the win with using lazy loading is not that > significant. > > Or perhaps a better way to put it is that the people who are really > concerned about speed have simply removed TiddlyWiki from the equation > and are working with tiddlers directly. > -- > Chris Dent http://burningchrome.com/ > [...] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
